Enhancing Performance with Switch Scanning
In a recent Phase I SBIR project, we developed a method for adjusting a single-switch scanning interface to increase a user's text entry rate (TER). We evaluated that method with nine individuals who use single-switch scanning to communicate. Text entry rates improved by an average of 120% (p=.003). All nine subjects increased their TER by at least 40% and five of the nine increased their TER by over 100%.
Results from this work were published in the Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, and we began Phase II research on this project in early 2015.
In Phase II, we built the Scanning Wizard software, to help others optimize scanning configurations in an efficient and effective way. This is a free website that supports one- or two-switch scanning, so please give it a try. In our field testing, 5 users achieved an average of 71% improvement in text entry rate by using Scanning Wizard.
We're interested in any feedback you may have on these results or our method for adjusting scanning systems. Feel free to contact us.
- Koester HH, Simpson R. (2017). Effectiveness and usability of Scanning Wizard software: a tool for enhancing switch scanning. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, ePub ahead of print.
- Koester HH, Simpson R. (2017). Use of Scanning Wizard can enhance text entry rate: preliminary results.AAATE 2017 Conference Proceedings, Sheffield, England, UK.
- Koester HH, Simpson R. (2017). Performance on the Scanning Wizard 'Switch' Test: Switch Users and Controls. Proceedings of RESNA 2017 Conference, New Orleans, LA.
- Koester HH, Simpson R. (2014). A Method for Enhancing Text Entry Rate with Single-switch Scanning. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 51(6): 995-1012.
- Mankowski R, Simpson R, Koester HH. (2013). Validating a Model of Row-Column Scanning. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8(4):321-9. [abstract]
- Simpson R, Mankowski R, Koester HH. (2011). Modeling One-Switch Row-Column Scanning with Errors and Error Correction Methods. The Open Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 4: 1-12.
- Simpson R, Koester HH, LoPresti E. (2007). Selecting an Appropriate Scan Rate: The .65 Rule. Assistive Technology, 19(2):51-58. [abstract]
For a full listing of all of our research publications, visit the Publications page.
We thank the following funding agencies for their support, as well as the participants in our studies.
- National Institutes of Health, SBIR awards.